Head to head · August 31, 2026
PlatinumLED BIOMAX 900 vs BestQool Pro300
The Pro300 is the cheaper of the two at $899, so it wins on value if the specs are close enough for your use. The BIOMAX 900 covers more wavelengths, though the extra bands have thinner research behind them than 660nm and 850nm.
DISCLOSURE — we earn commission on purchases made through our links, at no extra cost to you. Rankings come from specifications and measurements, never from commission rates.
| Spec | BIOMAX 900 | Pro300 |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $1,299 | $899 |
| Wavelengths | 480nm · 630nm · 660nm · 810nm · 830nm · 850nm · 1060nm | 630nm · 660nm · 850nm · 940nm |
| Emitters | 300 | 300 |
| Irradiance | 90.3 mW/cm2 average, 113 mW/cm2 peak (75 mW/cm2 average at 12 in) at 6 in (also reported at 12 in), measured by Alex Fergus (Light Therapy Insiders) | Brand claims 106 mW/cm2 at 3 in. Note the non-standard distance: the category convention is 6 in, and a 3 in reading flatters the number |
| Coverage | 36 in tall panel | Effective coverage 46.5 x 17.4 in at 6 in; panel 13.5 x 2.6 x 36.4 in |
| FDA status | registered | registered |
| Warranty | 3 yr | 2 yr |
| Returns | 60 days | 30 days |
BIOMAX 900
Seven wavelengths, the widest spread in the category, and genuinely good hardware. Independent spectrometer testing puts real output near 87 mW/cm2 against an advertised 135.
Pro300
Good value for full-body coverage, but read the regulatory line carefully: 510(k) exempt is not the same as FDA cleared, and the irradiance is measured at a flattering distance.