BestQool
Pro300 review
Good value for full-body coverage, but read the regulatory line carefully: 510(k) exempt is not the same as FDA cleared, and the irradiance is measured at a flattering distance.
DISCLOSURE — we earn commission on purchases made through our links, at no extra cost to you. Rankings come from specifications and measurements, never from commission rates.
What we like
- Four wavelengths including 940nm at a competitive full-body price
- Publishes dimensions, weight and effective coverage, which several rivals do not
- Modular, connects to further units
What to know
- Irradiance quoted at 3 in rather than the conventional 6 in, which inflates it
- Described as a Class II Medical Device while actually being 510(k) exempt, meaning it never went through clearance review
- Their own refund policy page contradicts their returns page
Full specifications
Anything marked not published is missing from the manufacturer's own materials. We do not fill those gaps with estimates.
| Price | $899 |
|---|---|
| Wavelengths | 630nm · 660nm · 850nm · 940nm |
| LED count | 300 |
| Irradiance | Brand claimBrand claims 106 mW/cm2 at 3 in. Note the non-standard distance: the category convention is 6 in, and a 3 in reading flatters the number |
| Coverage | Effective coverage 46.5 x 17.4 in at 6 in; panel 13.5 x 2.6 x 36.4 in |
| Power draw | 500W |
| FDA status | registered |
| Warranty | 2 years |
| Returns | 30 days |
Best for
- Widest wavelength spread per dollar
- Full body on a budget
- 940nm
Compare it
Research at these wavelengths
Studies whose protocol used a wavelength this device emits, within 15nm. Each records the dose it delivered, which is the number to hold a marketing claim against.
Sources
Specifications on this page come from the manufacturer and the independent testing listed below. Verified August 31, 2026.
We participate in the BestQool affiliate program. See our disclosure.