Head to head · August 31, 2026
MitoPRO 1500+ vs PlatinumLED BIOMAX 900
The MitoPRO 1500+ is the cheaper of the two at $1,169, so it wins on value if the specs are close enough for your use. The BIOMAX 900 packs more emitters (300 against 300), which usually means a shorter session for the same dose. The BIOMAX 900 covers more wavelengths, though the extra bands have thinner research behind them than 660nm and 850nm.
DISCLOSURE — we earn commission on purchases made through our links, at no extra cost to you. Rankings come from specifications and measurements, never from commission rates.
| Spec | MitoPRO 1500+ | BIOMAX 900 |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $1,169 | $1,299 |
| Wavelengths | 630nm · 660nm · 830nm · 850nm | 480nm · 630nm · 660nm · 810nm · 830nm · 850nm · 1060nm |
| Emitters | 300 | 300 |
| Irradiance | 76.5 mW/cm2 average, 87 mW/cm2 peak at 6 in, measured by Alex Fergus (Light Therapy Insiders). Brand claims claimed 170mW/cm2 | 90.3 mW/cm2 average, 113 mW/cm2 peak (75 mW/cm2 average at 12 in) at 6 in (also reported at 12 in), measured by Alex Fergus (Light Therapy Insiders) |
| Coverage | Half body, 13 x 47 in panel | 36 in tall panel |
| FDA status | registered | registered |
| Warranty | 3 yr | 3 yr |
| Returns | 60 days | 60 days |
MitoPRO 1500+
The value benchmark for half-body panels. Independent testing puts real output near 76 mW/cm2 average, which is unusually close to what the brand advertises.
BIOMAX 900
Seven wavelengths, the widest spread in the category, and genuinely good hardware. Independent spectrometer testing puts real output near 87 mW/cm2 against an advertised 135.