Head to head · August 31, 2026
BestQool Pro300 vs Infraredi Pro Max 2.0
The Pro300 is the cheaper of the two at $899, so it wins on value if the specs are close enough for your use. The Pro Max 2.0 covers more wavelengths, though the extra bands have thinner research behind them than 660nm and 850nm.
DISCLOSURE — we earn commission on purchases made through our links, at no extra cost to you. Rankings come from specifications and measurements, never from commission rates.
| Spec | Pro300 | Pro Max 2.0 |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $899 | $959 |
| Wavelengths | 630nm · 660nm · 850nm · 940nm | 630nm · 660nm · 810nm · 830nm · 850nm |
| Emitters | 300 | 210 |
| Irradiance | Brand claims 106 mW/cm2 at 3 in. Note the non-standard distance: the category convention is 6 in, and a 3 in reading flatters the number | 72 mW/cm2 average (the tester's separate May 2024 'most powerful panels' article lists 68mw/cm2 for the same device) at 6 in, measured by Alex Fergus (Light Therapy Insiders) |
| Coverage | Effective coverage 46.5 x 17.4 in at 6 in; panel 13.5 x 2.6 x 36.4 in | 90.8 x 22 cm, 9 kg; half body |
| FDA status | registered | unknown |
| Warranty | 2 yr | 3 yr |
| Returns | 30 days | 60 days |
Pro300
Good value for full-body coverage, but read the regulatory line carefully: 510(k) exempt is not the same as FDA cleared, and the irradiance is measured at a flattering distance.
Pro Max 2.0
The gap between the 250 mW/cm2 headline and the 68 mW/cm2 somebody actually measured is the single most useful fact about this panel.