Head to head · August 31, 2026
MitoPRO 1500+ vs Infraredi Pro Max 2.0
The Pro Max 2.0 is the cheaper of the two at $959, so it wins on value if the specs are close enough for your use. The MitoPRO 1500+ packs more emitters (300 against 210), which usually means a shorter session for the same dose. The Pro Max 2.0 covers more wavelengths, though the extra bands have thinner research behind them than 660nm and 850nm.
DISCLOSURE — we earn commission on purchases made through our links, at no extra cost to you. Rankings come from specifications and measurements, never from commission rates.
| Spec | MitoPRO 1500+ | Pro Max 2.0 |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $1,169 | $959 |
| Wavelengths | 630nm · 660nm · 830nm · 850nm | 630nm · 660nm · 810nm · 830nm · 850nm |
| Emitters | 300 | 210 |
| Irradiance | 76.5 mW/cm2 average, 87 mW/cm2 peak at 6 in, measured by Alex Fergus (Light Therapy Insiders). Brand claims claimed 170mW/cm2 | 72 mW/cm2 average (the tester's separate May 2024 'most powerful panels' article lists 68mw/cm2 for the same device) at 6 in, measured by Alex Fergus (Light Therapy Insiders) |
| Coverage | Half body, 13 x 47 in panel | 90.8 x 22 cm, 9 kg; half body |
| FDA status | registered | unknown |
| Warranty | 3 yr | 3 yr |
| Returns | 60 days | 60 days |
MitoPRO 1500+
The value benchmark for half-body panels. Independent testing puts real output near 76 mW/cm2 average, which is unusually close to what the brand advertises.
Pro Max 2.0
The gap between the 250 mW/cm2 headline and the 68 mW/cm2 somebody actually measured is the single most useful fact about this panel.