Head to head · August 31, 2026
Shark Beauty CryoGlow LED Face Mask vs Qure Q-Rejuvalight Pro
The CryoGlow LED Face Mask is the cheaper of the two at $349.99, so it wins on value if the specs are close enough for your use. The Q-Rejuvalight Pro packs more emitters (160 against 160), which usually means a shorter session for the same dose. The Q-Rejuvalight Pro covers more wavelengths, though the extra bands have thinner research behind them than 660nm and 850nm.
DISCLOSURE — we earn commission on purchases made through our links, at no extra cost to you. Rankings come from specifications and measurements, never from commission rates.
| Spec | CryoGlow LED Face Mask | Q-Rejuvalight Pro |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $349.99 | $399 |
| Wavelengths | 415nm · 630nm · 830nm | 415nm · 605nm · 630nm · 660nm · 880nm |
| Emitters | 160 | 160 |
| Irradiance | Not published | Not published |
| Coverage | Full face rigid mask plus clip-on under-eye chill pads | Full face, 5 selectable facial zones |
| FDA status | cleared | cleared |
| Warranty | 2 yr | 1 yr |
| Returns | 60 days | 30 days |
CryoGlow LED Face Mask
Shark's own spec sheet lists blue as 630nm, which is a typo, an independent LED device designer measured it at 415nm. Peak draw is 35W with 16.92W in normal operation.
Q-Rejuvalight Pro
FDA cleared under K230042 for wrinkles and acne. Qure is one of the few brands that prints its 510(k) number, which counts for something, but the missing irradiance spec still leaves a gap.