Shark Beauty
CryoGlow LED Face Mask review
Shark's own spec sheet lists blue as 630nm, which is a typo, an independent LED device designer measured it at 415nm. Peak draw is 35W with 16.92W in normal operation.
DISCLOSURE — we earn commission on purchases made through our links, at no extra cost to you. Rankings come from specifications and measurements, never from commission rates.
What we like
- 160 tri-wick LEDs, so all 480 emitters fire in every mode with no dead zones
- Under-eye cooling pads are genuinely unusual at this price
- 60 day money-back window and a 2 year warranty
What to know
- Rigid shell, less comfortable than flexible silicone masks
- Shark publishes wattage but no mW/cm2 irradiance figure
- Heavier than silicone masks at 1.5 lb
Full specifications
Anything marked not published is missing from the manufacturer's own materials. We do not fill those gaps with estimates.
| Price | $349.99 |
|---|---|
| Wavelengths | 415nm · 630nm · 830nm |
| LED count | 160 |
| Irradiance | Not published |
| Coverage | Full face rigid mask plus clip-on under-eye chill pads |
| Power draw | 35W |
| FDA status | cleared |
| Warranty | 2 years |
| Returns | 60 days |
Best for
- Under-eye puffiness
- Red, blue and near-infrared in one device
Compare it
Research at these wavelengths
Studies whose protocol used a wavelength this device emits, within 15nm. Each records the dose it delivered, which is the number to hold a marketing claim against.
Sources
Specifications on this page come from the manufacturer and the independent testing listed below. Verified August 31, 2026.