Head to head · August 31, 2026
Shark Beauty CryoGlow LED Face Mask vs LightStim for Wrinkles
The LightStim for Wrinkles is the cheaper of the two at $249, so it wins on value if the specs are close enough for your use. The CryoGlow LED Face Mask packs more emitters (160 against 72), which usually means a shorter session for the same dose. The LightStim for Wrinkles covers more wavelengths, though the extra bands have thinner research behind them than 660nm and 850nm.
DISCLOSURE — we earn commission on purchases made through our links, at no extra cost to you. Rankings come from specifications and measurements, never from commission rates.
| Spec | CryoGlow LED Face Mask | LightStim for Wrinkles |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $349.99 | $249 |
| Wavelengths | 415nm · 630nm · 830nm | 605nm · 630nm · 660nm · 855nm |
| Emitters | 160 | 72 |
| Irradiance | Not published | Not published |
| Coverage | Full face rigid mask plus clip-on under-eye chill pads | Handheld, treats one small area at a time, 3 minutes per zone |
| FDA status | cleared | cleared |
| Warranty | 2 yr | 5 yr |
| Returns | 60 days | Not published |
CryoGlow LED Face Mask
Shark's own spec sheet lists blue as 630nm, which is a typo, an independent LED device designer measured it at 415nm. Peak draw is 35W with 16.92W in normal operation.
LightStim for Wrinkles
A 2010s-era device that keeps selling on warranty and clinical pedigree rather than specs. Fine for targeted work, slow if you want whole-face coverage.