Head to head · August 31, 2026
Red Light Rising Target Light 2.0 vs BestQool Redot L
The Target Light 2.0 is the cheaper of the two at £260, so it wins on value if the specs are close enough for your use. The Redot L packs more emitters (400 against 48), which usually means a shorter session for the same dose.
DISCLOSURE — we earn commission on purchases made through our links, at no extra cost to you. Rankings come from specifications and measurements, never from commission rates.
| Spec | Target Light 2.0 | Redot L |
|---|---|---|
| Price | £260 | $319 |
| Wavelengths | 660nm · 850nm | 660nm · 850nm |
| Emitters | 48 | 400 |
| Irradiance | 137.10 mW/cm2 at 10 cm, measured by LIA Laboratory (UK, accredited, operated by the Lighting Industry Association) to EN 62471:2008 on a Bentham IDR300, published as report P10145A. Full falloff curve published: 99.56 at 15 cm, 84.88 at 20 cm, 54.84 at 30 cm | Brand states 56 mW/cm2 at the surface at power level 5. One of the few mats that names both the distance and the power setting |
| Coverage | 150 x 120 mm; face, single joint or targeted area | 38 x 23 in, splices to a second mat for full body |
| FDA status | unknown | registered |
| Warranty | 1 yr | 1 yr |
| Returns | 365 days | 30 days |
Target Light 2.0
Everything else in this category publishes marketing copy. This publishes an accredited laboratory report number you can look up. That alone makes it the reference point for what an honest spec sheet looks like.
Redot L
The value pick, and the only mat that states the exact conditions of its measurement. Read 510(k) exempt as registered, not cleared: BestQool never submitted this to the FDA for review.