Head to head · August 31, 2026
BestQool Pro300 vs Bon Charge Max
The Pro300 is the cheaper of the two at $899, so it wins on value if the specs are close enough for your use. The Max packs more emitters (400 against 300), which usually means a shorter session for the same dose. The Pro300 covers more wavelengths, though the extra bands have thinner research behind them than 660nm and 850nm.
DISCLOSURE — we earn commission on purchases made through our links, at no extra cost to you. Rankings come from specifications and measurements, never from commission rates.
| Spec | Pro300 | Max |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $899 | $999 |
| Wavelengths | 630nm · 660nm · 850nm · 940nm | 660nm · 850nm |
| Emitters | 300 | 400 |
| Irradiance | Brand claims 106 mW/cm2 at 3 in. Note the non-standard distance: the category convention is 6 in, and a 3 in reading flatters the number | Brand states greater than 142 mW/cm2 with no measurement distance and no instrument named. The 3 to 12 in figure on the page is a usage instruction, not a measurement distance |
| Coverage | Effective coverage 46.5 x 17.4 in at 6 in; panel 13.5 x 2.6 x 36.4 in | 91 x 21 x 6.5 cm, 8 kg |
| FDA status | registered | registered |
| Warranty | 2 yr | 1 yr |
| Returns | 30 days | 30 days |
Pro300
Good value for full-body coverage, but read the regulatory line carefully: 510(k) exempt is not the same as FDA cleared, and the irradiance is measured at a flattering distance.
Max
A recognised wellness brand with the vaguest irradiance disclosure in our data. Two wavelengths, no measurement distance, and the shortest warranty here.