Quadriceps femoris performance after resistance training with and without photobiomodulation in elderly women: a randomized clinical trial.

What the authors concluded

Quadriceps femoris performance of older women was not improved when photobiomodulation was associated to the proposed quadriceps femoris resistance training, when compared to training without photobiomodulation and a sedentary group." Comment: The text says they used 808 nm device but Figure 1 says 850 nm. There are also other dosage inconsistencies, eg. claiming 40s irradiation per application

Devices that emit this wavelength

Matched on wavelength within 15nm, since LED bins vary by roughly that much and a tighter match would be false precision. Where we have an irradiance figure, the session length is the time needed to reach this study's dose of 91 J/cm² at that intensity.

Matching a wavelength is not the same as reproducing a trial. Session times assume the device's published irradiance is accurate at the distance it was measured, which on brand-claim figures is often optimistic. Where a device publishes both a peak and an average we use the average, and where it publishes a falloff curve we use the lowest figure, so these times run long rather than short. Clinical protocols also control for spot size, contact and skin type in ways a home device cannot.