Photo-biomodulatory response of low-power laser irradiation on burn tissue repair in mice.

What the authors concluded

In summary, low-power lasers at wavelength 632.8, 785, and 830 nm have shown beneficial effects in burn wound healing, compared to untreated controls. Further, 3-J/cm2 fluence of 830 nm exhibited the best response among the other wavelengths and fluences under study in enhancing wound repair in full thickness burn injury in mice. The treatment promoted proliferation, neovascularization, depositi

Devices that emit this wavelength

Matched on wavelength within 15nm, since LED bins vary by roughly that much and a tighter match would be false precision. Where we have an irradiance figure, the session length is the time needed to reach this study's dose of 1 J/cm² at that intensity.

Matching a wavelength is not the same as reproducing a trial. Session times assume the device's published irradiance is accurate at the distance it was measured, which on brand-claim figures is often optimistic. Where a device publishes both a peak and an average we use the average, and where it publishes a falloff curve we use the lowest figure, so these times run long rather than short. Clinical protocols also control for spot size, contact and skin type in ways a home device cannot.