🧑 Human ⚔ Comparison study, randomized 👥 40 participants ⌛ 5 weeks · 2010 · Turkey (Istanbul)
Management of myofascial pain: low-level laser therapy versus occlusal splints.
Öz · J Craniofac Surg · 2010
The protocol this study used
What the authors concluded
This particular type of low-level laser therapy (820 nm, 3 J/cm2, 300-mW output power) is as effective as occlusal splint in pain release and mandibular movement improvement in MP." Comment: According to this paper, occlusal splint was used 24h/day for 3 months which sounds unlikely. Also it seems that PBM was used for 5 weeks and occlusal splint for 3 months, so the interventions (and the evalu
Devices that emit this wavelength
Matched on wavelength within 15nm, since LED bins vary by roughly that much and a tighter match would be false precision. Where we have an irradiance figure, the session length is the time needed to reach this study's dose of 3 J/cm² at that intensity.
DISCLOSURE — we earn commission on purchases made through our links, at no extra cost to you. Rankings come from specifications and measurements, never from commission rates.
Matching a wavelength is not the same as reproducing a trial. Session times assume the device's published irradiance is accurate at the distance it was measured, which on brand-claim figures is often optimistic. Where a device publishes both a peak and an average we use the average, and where it publishes a falloff curve we use the lowest figure, so these times run long rather than short. Clinical protocols also control for spot size, contact and skin type in ways a home device cannot.
Source
Dosimetry extracted by Vladimir Heiskanen in Photobiomodulation (PBM) research - a comprehensive database. Citation resolved against PubMed.