🧑 Human 🎲 Randomized trial, double-blind 👥 60 participants ⌛ 5 days · 2012 · Taiwan (Taipei)
Evaluation of the effect of laser acupuncture and cupping with ryodoraku and visual analog scale on low back pain.
Lin · Evid Based Complement Alternat Med · 2012
The protocol this study used
What the authors concluded
No difference between active laser and placebo. Note: The anatomical site of irradiation was leg, not back...
Devices that emit this wavelength
Matched on wavelength within 15nm, since LED bins vary by roughly that much and a tighter match would be false precision. Where we have an irradiance figure, the session length is the time needed to reach this study's dose of 15 J/cm² at that intensity.
DISCLOSURE — we earn commission on purchases made through our links, at no extra cost to you. Rankings come from specifications and measurements, never from commission rates.
Matching a wavelength is not the same as reproducing a trial. Session times assume the device's published irradiance is accurate at the distance it was measured, which on brand-claim figures is often optimistic. Where a device publishes both a peak and an average we use the average, and where it publishes a falloff curve we use the lowest figure, so these times run long rather than short. Clinical protocols also control for spot size, contact and skin type in ways a home device cannot.
Source
Dosimetry extracted by Vladimir Heiskanen in Photobiomodulation (PBM) research - a comprehensive database. Citation resolved against PubMed.