🐀 Rat · 2026 · Brazil (Araçatuba)
Effect of photobiomodulation on femoral fracture specimens in rats with experimentally induced osteoporosis
Santos · Bone · 2026
The protocol this study used
What the authors concluded
The microtomographic analysis showed no differences between the groups analyzed in any experimental period (p > 0.05). Histometric analysis showed a greater area of newly formed bone for the PBM group compared to the WPBM group (p < 0.05), corroborating the immunohistochemical result, which shows greater labeling of TGF-B and VEGF.
Devices that emit this wavelength
Matched on wavelength within 15nm, since LED bins vary by roughly that much and a tighter match would be false precision. Where we have an irradiance figure, the session length is the time needed to reach this study's dose of 212 J/cm² at that intensity.
DISCLOSURE — we earn commission on purchases made through our links, at no extra cost to you. Rankings come from specifications and measurements, never from commission rates.
Matching a wavelength is not the same as reproducing a trial. Session times assume the device's published irradiance is accurate at the distance it was measured, which on brand-claim figures is often optimistic. Where a device publishes both a peak and an average we use the average, and where it publishes a falloff curve we use the lowest figure, so these times run long rather than short. Clinical protocols also control for spot size, contact and skin type in ways a home device cannot.
Source
Dosimetry extracted by Vladimir Heiskanen in Photobiomodulation (PBM) research - a comprehensive database. Citation resolved against PubMed.