Comparison of biophysical properties of skin measured by using non-invasive techniques in the KM mice following 595 nm pulsed dye, 1064 nm Q-Switched Nd:YAG and 1320 nm Nd:YAG laser non-ablative rejuvenation.

What the authors concluded

Our data showed the 1064 nm Q-switched Nd:YAG laser treatment was most effective in improving the skins' mechanical properties, while the 1320 nm Nd:YAG laser can enhance greatly the skin barrier function and the water-holding capacity." Comment: The laser power output or light intensity is not given. It's not clear whether the treatment is given as a "short pulse" or in a similar way as in LLLT

Devices that emit this wavelength

Matched on wavelength within 15nm, since LED bins vary by roughly that much and a tighter match would be false precision. Where we have an irradiance figure, the session length is the time needed to reach this study's dose of 12 J/cm² at that intensity.

Matching a wavelength is not the same as reproducing a trial. Session times assume the device's published irradiance is accurate at the distance it was measured, which on brand-claim figures is often optimistic. Where a device publishes both a peak and an average we use the average, and where it publishes a falloff curve we use the lowest figure, so these times run long rather than short. Clinical protocols also control for spot size, contact and skin type in ways a home device cannot.