🧑 Human ⚔ Comparison study 👥 61 participants ⌛ 3-week treatment / 15-week study · 2018 · Hungary (Gyor)
Comparative study of shockwave therapy and low-level laser therapy effects in patients with myofascial pain syndrome of the trapezius.
Király · Rheumatol Int · 2018
The protocol this study used
What the authors concluded
The results of our study point to a conclusion that both laser and shockwave therapy are effective in myofascial pain syndrome, though we found shockwave therapy to be somewhat more beneficial." Comment: Wavelength wasn't stated in the article, but according to the manufacturer of the device PR999 4W scanning laser, it emits a combination of 808 and 940 nm near-infrared light Comment: See full
Devices that emit this wavelength
Matched on wavelength within 15nm, since LED bins vary by roughly that much and a tighter match would be false precision. Where we have an irradiance figure, the session length is the time needed to reach this study's dose of 3 J/cm² at that intensity.
DISCLOSURE — we earn commission on purchases made through our links, at no extra cost to you. Rankings come from specifications and measurements, never from commission rates.
Matching a wavelength is not the same as reproducing a trial. Session times assume the device's published irradiance is accurate at the distance it was measured, which on brand-claim figures is often optimistic. Where a device publishes both a peak and an average we use the average, and where it publishes a falloff curve we use the lowest figure, so these times run long rather than short. Clinical protocols also control for spot size, contact and skin type in ways a home device cannot.
Source
Dosimetry extracted by Vladimir Heiskanen in Photobiomodulation (PBM) research - a comprehensive database. Citation resolved against PubMed.