🧑 Human 📄 Single-arm trial 👥 22 participants ⌛ 4-week treatment / 3-month study · 2008 · USA (New York, NY)
A study to determine the efficacy of a novel handheld light-emitting diode device in the treatment of photoaged skin.
Sadick NS · J Cosmet Dermatol · 2008
The protocol this study used
What the authors concluded
Seventy-four percent of the subjects reported a visible improvement in fine lines and wrinkles at 8 weeks posttreatment. Combination red and near-infrared LED therapy delivered from a small portable handheld unit represents an effective and acceptable method of photo rejuvenation.
Devices that emit this wavelength
Matched on wavelength within 15nm, since LED bins vary by roughly that much and a tighter match would be false precision. Where we have an irradiance figure, the session length is the time needed to reach this study's dose of 126 J/cm² at that intensity.
DISCLOSURE — we earn commission on purchases made through our links, at no extra cost to you. Rankings come from specifications and measurements, never from commission rates.
Matching a wavelength is not the same as reproducing a trial. Session times assume the device's published irradiance is accurate at the distance it was measured, which on brand-claim figures is often optimistic. Where a device publishes both a peak and an average we use the average, and where it publishes a falloff curve we use the lowest figure, so these times run long rather than short. Clinical protocols also control for spot size, contact and skin type in ways a home device cannot.
Source
Dosimetry extracted by Vladimir Heiskanen in Photobiomodulation (PBM) research - a comprehensive database. Citation resolved against PubMed.