Who they are
Infraredi sells red light panels direct, with two models in our data: the Pro Max 2.0 at $1,199 list and $959 on sale, and the Pro Elite 2.0 at $4,399 list and $3,519 on sale. Our records note the absence of both FDA and TGA status, and the reference to the Australian regulator alongside the American one suggests a brand selling into both markets. Manufacturing location is not published anywhere in our data.
Standing terms are good: free shipping on all orders, a 60 day risk-free trial and a three year warranty. The brand runs a sitewide 20 percent sale with no end date published, which in practice means the sale price is the price. Affiliates are explicitly barred from promoting on coupon websites.
What they actually publish
A solar-meter number with no distance, and an independent measurement that lands at roughly a quarter of it.
Infraredi claims 250 mW/cm2, stated as a solar meter reading, with no measuring distance given. That first part is a small point in its favour: at least the brand says which instrument class produced the number, which Bon Charge, Vellgus and Vital Red Light all decline to do. Solar meters read across the full spectrum and consistently return figures far above what a spectrometer isolating therapeutic wavelengths will show. Mito and Block Blue Light both publish that gap openly on their own pages.
The absence of a distance is the fatal part. Without it the figure cannot be compared with anything, and it cannot be used to calculate a dose.
Then there is the independent number. Alex Fergus measured the Pro Max 2.0 at 68 mW/cm2 at 6 inches on a Hopoocolor spectrometer, taken as a nine-point average across the panel face. That is about 27 percent of the advertised claim. Put plainly: the marketing headline is 3.7 times the figure someone actually measured.
Two things are true at once here, and both matter. The 68 mW/cm2 result is respectable and mid-pack against other independently metered panels. The PlatinumLED BIOMAX 900 measured 87, the Mito MitoPRO 1500+ measured 76.5 average, the Rouge Pro G4 measured 59.2 average. Infraredi sits comfortably inside that group. It is a decent panel. It is just not a 250 mW/cm2 panel, and nothing on the product page prepares a buyer for that.
The Pro Elite 2.0 carries the identical 250 claim with no distance, and nobody has metered it. Since it is built from four Pro Max panels in a frame, plan on similar real output per unit area.
The range
The Pro Max 2.0 is the volume seller: 210 LEDs across five wavelengths at 630, 660, 810, 830 and 850nm, 340W, 90.8 x 22 cm and 9 kg, half-body coverage. Three year warranty, 60 day trial.
The Pro Elite 2.0 is the full-body unit: 840 LEDs, same five wavelengths, 1,360W, 181.6 x 44 cm and 36 kg. It is modular and is essentially four Pro Max panels assembled into one frame. Three year warranty, 60 day trial. At over $3,500 even discounted, and with a real 1,360W draw, it costs meaningful money to run as well as to buy.
Both publish full dimensions and weight, which is more than EMR-TEK manages on a comparable floor panel, and both come with genuinely good buyer terms.
Regulatory position
No FDA status. No TGA status. Neither is published anywhere in our data for either device.
That means no clearance, no registration, and no exemption claimed in either market. As with Hooga and EMR-TEK, saying nothing is preferable to overstating, and it is a long way better than the brands here that describe an administrative listing in language that sounds like regulatory endorsement. But be clear about the consequence: there is no regulatory statement of any kind attached to these panels, no reviewed intended use, and nothing for a buyer to hold the brand to.
Cleared is not approved, and Infraredi claims neither.
Who should buy it, who should not
Buy the Pro Max 2.0 if you want half-body coverage from a panel that has actually been independently measured, and you are willing to work from the 68 mW/cm2 figure rather than the one on the box. At $959 with a three year warranty and a 60 day trial, that is a fair deal and the terms are among the better ones in our data. Buy the Pro Elite 2.0 only if you genuinely need 181 cm of coverage daily and the running cost does not bother you.
Do not buy either on the 250 mW/cm2 claim. It has no distance attached and the one model anyone has metered came in at 27 percent of it. Do not assume the Pro Elite performs better per unit area than the Pro Max, because it is the same panel four times over. And if verified output is the deciding factor, note that Infraredi's real measured number is close to Rouge's and below PlatinumLED's, which is a very different ranking from the one the marketing implies.